Full Circle is a Happy Ending
When I was six years old, my favorite stories were The Hobbit, the Chronicles of Narnia, Through the Looking Glass (but not Alice in Wonderland, which frightened me), Perloo the Bold, Calvin and Hobbes comic strips, Dinotopia, and my dad’s old collection of Spiderman comic books from the early 70s. I didn’t like stories that were set in “the real world” because I already lived in “the real world” and knew enough about what that was like, thank you very much. Fantasy books which lingered in the real world a little too long were less beloved to me. I didn’t really care about what the children were doing in the Professor’s house; I just wanted to enter the wardrobe and see the Faun carrying his parcels in the snow. These books had to include animals that talked, magic, epic journeys, prophecies, characters that were like me but also impossibly noble and self sacrificing (and characters that were so irredeemably nasty that one couldn’t possibly find a single saving quality), and legendary battles of good and evil where evil always succumbed to the forces of good. When I was six, happy endings were mandatory. If a book didn’t have a happy ending, I would take the offending item off my bookshelf and hide it in the back of my closet. It was a zero tolerance policy. I’m ashamed to admit this, but I once tearfully begged my Grandpa to throw away a movie that ended so sadly that I couldn’t bear its continuing existence in my house. Poor Papa had rented it…he pretended to throw it in the trash and retrieved it later when he thought I wasn’t looking.
. For myself at age six, the world of fantasy and its stories were fun because it felt removed from the constraints of reality. The differences between good and evil were as easy to recognize as the difference between black and white, and the good characters always got their happy ending.
If they didn’t, it wasn’t a story worth reading and rereading. Let the closet have it.
Somewhere (it would be near impossible to pinpoint exactly where) in my experience of growing up, I began to favor the stories that ended unhappily. I have a few guesses as to why. The first has to do with a naïve perception of stories that ended horribly as being better literature because “they weren’t written for kids”. In school, the advanced reading books had endings where the characters you loved the most received the worst fates; where despondent Edna Pontellier swims to her death, John the Savage hangs himself after engaging in a soma orgy, Charlie loses his artificially gained intelligence and morns the loss of Algernon, and George has to shoot Lenny. In my mind, the distinction became very clear: unhappy endings equaled good literature and happy endings only happened in Disney movies and naïve fairy tales. If I was going to be any sort of good writer, I had to write stories with unhappy endings.
The second reason was that I was gaining life experience. In losing my own naivety, I began to realize that distinguishing between good and evil wasn’t as easy as seeing black and white. I started to favor the stories that were a more direct representation of the “reality” I existed in. I learned in the real world, self revelations didn’t take place over night after a descent, and a lot of the time the people who most deserved the happy ending didn’t get it.
But you shouldn’t judge me too harshly. I was still operating under the illusion that unhappy endings existed.
Frye writes that convention of the happy ending in romance may seem “faked, manipulated, or thrown in as a contemptuous concession to a weak-minded reader” (134). However, as Frye points out, this formula of a romance is a more obvious illustration of the underlying archetypes that romantic fiction typically follows. But while romance follows set formulas, there are always worlds of possibilities contained within these streams of stories. The reader is aware that ironic, or more “serious” literature could never employ a conventional happy ending because it would be forced or even dishonest. However, they may not be aware that romantic stories demand it for the characters that survive until the end of the story. The characters that populate romance novels demonstrate an intense desire for the happy ending, and through their incredible struggles and will to survive the descent, the survivors are always rewarded. But what does a happy ending traditionally entail? Why is it necessary to the conventions of romance? A happy ending for a romance novel is not merely essential, it is the only logical conclusion to the five elements of perfect romance: story, revelations, quest, and apparent death. The happy ending is a cyclical return to the start renewed and almost always coincides with two changes of personal state: the reclamation of identity and the loss of virginity. In the happy endings of romance, sexual union mirrors the uniting of opposites necessary for the recovery of identity.
STORY:
“Literature is an aspect of the human compulsion to create in the face of chaos. Romance…(is) the area where we can see most clearly that the maze without a plan and the maze not without a plan are two aspects of the same thing” (Frye 31)
As Dr. Sexson said, the story is the most important element of romance. The act of storytelling takes the receiver across the boundary lines of time. Once seduced, we forget the machinations and this world for the more colorful, the sacred, the dream time outside of time. We are prevented from living too much time in this world, yet receive the enormous bonus of extensions on our own experience. Through the powers of storytelling, the receivers are both outside of time and adding time to their own natural lives. But the naïve receiver of stories doesn’t know this. The naïve receiver of the story simply listens, wide eyed and open mouthed, as the storyteller seduces him into dream time. As a simple naïve receiver of the story is merely entertained by the storyteller, in order to move to the next level of appreciation he must observe the mechanism of the story itself.
The mechanism of the story requires the romance to move both vertical (in the up-down-up motion) as well in the motion of the gyre or vortex (we express this in the phrase “we so inevitably use when summarizing a romantic plot ‘it turns out that…’” (Frye 91). In this cyclical movement, the characters move from the idyllic world to the world of descent and ascend back again with reclaimed identity. As the upward journey is either a journey of return to the creator or “the creative power of man returning to its original awareness” (Frye 157) and “virginity is an appropriate image for attaining original identity: what is objectively untouched symbolizes what is subjectively contained” (Frye 153) there is a strong connection between identity, virginity, and the divine. Virginity and identity are powerful sources of movement in romance because they both revolve around the same concept of creation. The mechanism of romance illustrates that divine creation, human recreation, and self formation have the same shape, and like the romance itself all of these elements return us to the start.
But why is it so important to recognize the mechanism? In journeying towards our own identity, we must escape this reality in order to find and understand ourselves. It is when we realize that romance is not a trite form of storytelling meant to amuse, but life itself that we are free to move up…and laugh. The whole thing of life is unreal. The next step of moving up or across (depending on your view) is to recognize that we are no more real than the characters in stories. When the story comes to an end, we come to an end. We too follow the machinations of romance and gyre back around to arrive exactly where we started.
REVELATION
“The more important stories are also imaginative, but incidentally so: they are intended to convey something more like special knowledge, something of what in religion is called revelation. Hence they are not thought of as imaginative or even of human origin, for a long time.” (Frye 7)
In romance, identity and reality are irrevocably linked to the movement of the story itself. As the story cycles from the idyllic world, to the descent, to the ascent back to the changed beginning, it is also a reflection of the movement of identity. In romance, the loss of identity begins the narrative. When the release from the external circumstances that forced the departure from identity finally comes, the narrative cycles back to the return to the state of identity. For romance, illusion “is an order of existence that is best called alienation” (Frye 54), and as “romance often deliberately descends into a world obviously related to the human unconscious” (Frye 57), by descending into the dream world and carrying the knowledge of its revelations out again, we have regained our identity. It is only through descent into dreams that we can truly know our waking selves.
Just as involuntarily acquired self knowledge is more terrible than death itself and something to be avoided at all costs, death is preferred over the involuntary loss of virginity. As woman is the physically weaker gender of our species, she must employ fraud tactics in order to stand as equal to the force her male counterpart possess. In order to teach the man the knowledge of love (which she always already possesses as woman), the female must employ fraud and secrecy in order to convince the hero that he is acting on his own initiative. In other words, the female must employ lies to create an illusion wherein the man learns lessons without his knowledge (sounds similar to the role of the storyteller perhaps?). Human imagination itself “is always a form of “lying”, that is, of turning away from the descriptive use of language and the correspondence form of truth” (Frye 46). We see this pattern again and again in romance: whether it is Sheherazade teaching her captor compassion through stories, or Princess Budhir fooling her husband with her male disguise. Until her identity can be recognized, the woman works in secrecy. When that time comes, she loses her virginity as the “happy ending” to the romance. But why? What is the connection between virginity and identity for the feminine?
For the female, “virginity is to a woman what honor is to a man, the symbol of the fact that she is not a slave” (Frye 73). However, with this social connotation comes an underlying illustration of the kind of power the female wields in romance. While her virginity is often associated with the “stresses and complications she has to go through before marriage”, the correctly timed loss of her virginity after marriage results in a recovery of her identity. However, an untimely “taking” of her virginity results in partial or total entrapment in the world of descent, doomed to wander horizontally without the vertical ascent and reclamation of the self. Woman is avoiding “the one fate which really is worse than death, the annihilation of one’s identity” (Frye 86). As she carries the knowledge of how to love intrinsically and men have to be taught how to love, the loss of her virginity corresponds with the recovery of identity and resulting happy ending.
In romance, revelations are remembrances. As all we are is the sum of our memories, the break and resulting recovery of memory is often employed in romance as the conflict that moves the hero to reclaim identity. Individuation—the bringing of opposites together—is the pivotal moment at the bottom of the descent’s bottom. In the uniting of opposites, identity is finally reclaimed and the ascent out of the dream world begins. This darkest part of the process by which a person becomes his/her true self mirrors the bringing together of opposites of sexual union. In Arthurian lore, the lance and grail (representative of male and female, respectively) is one example of the influence of this pervading image in romance. In Gaiwan and the Green Knight, the conquest of womanhood represents the fulfillment of the task of life. By recognizing her uniquely feminine features, the male reconciles the opposites within himself and achieves individuation. At the bottom of the bottom, romance forces the hero to confront the aspect of the self that is not himself—and in reconciliation with the opposite, individuation is possible. The hero begins the ascent that converges in identity and his happy ending: often a sexual union that is literally the bringing together of opposites in gender.
QUEST
“Great literature is what the eyes can see: it is the genuine infinite as opposed to the phony infinite, the endless adventures and endless sexual stimulation of the wandering of desire. But I have a notion that if the wandering of desire did not exist, great literature would not exist either” (Frye 30)
Perhaps that’s the truly remarkable commentary on the power of romance: by simplifying the moral facts into polarizations of good and evil, it’s better able to convey the complexities of this world. The paradoxes, contradictions, and unexplained coincidences all point to the one certain answer romance offers: the answer to the question is that there is no answer. We must accept this life as a mystery to be experienced rather than a problem to be solved. In an effort to reorder the natural world into art, human culture focuses on the “polarizing in romance between the world we want and the world we don’t want” (Frye 58). The simple polarizing formulas betray more about the reality of this world than reality itself. We would like to believe that imagination, when left to its own devices, produces original and fantastical work. However, this is not the case. Imagination is more inclined towards conventions and formulas than the fanciful. The actions described are external, not internal. However, these formulaic plots describing external events layer in such a way to describe our human internal structure: "The realist, with his sense of logical and horizontal continuity, leads us to the end of his story; the romancer, scrambling over a series of disconnected episodes, seems to be trying to get us to the top of it" (Frye 50). The happy ending is the natural conclusion to a story of coincidence and polarity precisely because “ends in much the same place that it begins" (Frye 51). This seems to point to the function of romance is to lead us back to the beginning; back to our role as the wide eyed listener, the child with naive wonder and innocence.
In Daphnis and Chloe, the world associated with this innocent child stage--the pastoral setting, the seasons of spring and summer, and the animals--are all connected with the innocent stage according to Frye. Daphnis and Chloe must eventually leave the idyllic for a world of conflict (and adventure, but of a less exciting variety). They endure a winter apart as well as unhappiness caused from a momentary apparent unequal birth. However, all is restored by the end with the mystery of birth solved, and the plot climbs out of the nightmare world of discontent to the top again--the happy ending. It returns to the same state of happiness depicted at the start, but innocence is lost. To fulfill the conventions of romance and complete the mandatory happy ending, the woman must lose her virginity: "That thing that they do must be something sweet, something that wipes out the bitterness of love" (Morales 179). The bitterness of love is the conflict of the romance, the loss of virginity the resolution. As Frye discusses, the stresses and plot complications associated with the virgin before her marriage are at the center of the conflict of the romance. Once she has passed out of the virginal world, we lose interest. She's happily married and having happily married sex, and we don't need to hear about that.
So if the ending of a romance is a spiral-like return to the beginning, how does loss of virginity at the end parody the virgin at the beginning? Romance proceeds toward an end that echoes the beginning, “but echoes it in a different world, the beginning in the demonic parody of the end” (Frye 49). It is a parody, not an exact replica: “The past is not returned to; it is recreated” (Frye 175). If creation is to memory what resurrection is to death, than sexual union and the loss of virginity functions as an act of physical recreation (resulting in a child), and well as creation of identity. Normally, man is the subject, women the other. But in romance, the roles are reversed because woman functions as the story itself: she is the object of the quest because she is the opposite, the path by which to reclaim the lost identity. One way this concept is illustrated is through woman’s association with the world of nature (viewed as “the other” from man’s perspective). In romance, the cycle of womanhood reflects the cycle of the seasons, and the hunt is a symbol of the masculine erotic pursuit with the object of pursuit’s identity (the deer, the feminine) encompassing the surrounding forest. With individuation at the very bottom as a mandatory element, the “quest romance takes on a spiral form, an open circle where the end is the beginning transformed and renewed by the heroic quest” (Frye 176). Woman is always the object of the quest, whether it is literally stated or not, because she represents the opposite required for the happy ending.
APPARENT DEATH
As the polarizing formulas of romance take us from one extreme to another, we descend from the idyllic pastoral world of naivety to the world of adventure, which involves “separation, loneliness, humiliation, pain, and the threat of more pain” (Frye 53). A necessary element of this descent is the apparent death.
Similar to how the movement from the idyll world to the descent is reminiscent of the “up and down” movement of romance, the movement from life to apparent death and back to life follows the same characteristic: “the center out of which everything proceeds, around which everything revolves, and back into which everything in the end must return.” (Zimmer 40). As a sleeper moves from consciousness to the dream world, the characters of romance must descend to a world where the reality differs from the one they originated in. In the dream world of descent, madness, pain and fear reign supreme; but so do revelations. Through the element of apparent death, romance demonstrates how the story itself is the governing force: you end when the story ends, but when the shell (death of the body) is no longer here the story still continues on. Romance wants to take us beyond death; and in order to complete the cycle convention, there must be a substitution for death so that “passing from death to birth” is possible for the same individual (Frye 89). In cycling back to the beginning and restoring the shell for the end of the story, substitution for death is an integral part of the happy ending for romance
There are some strange connections between death and woman’s sexuality; when Balan and Balin prepare to fight, Balan states “We came both out of one tomb; that is to say one mother’s belly, and so shall we lie both in one pit” (King and Corpse 149). The deity Cupid holds domain over the world of sexual love, “the hungry desire satisfied only by death” (Frye 154). Following the romance convention of cycling back to the beginning at the end, through inspecting sexual desire and death we see that beginnings and endings are one in the same: the mother’s womb is both life giving and a tomb, and sexual desire is not satisfied by creating new life—it can only be satiated by the end of life. In the world of reality, death appears to be the inevitable end. Through romance and myth “ the feeling that new life is inevitable comes to us from myth and fable. The latter is therefore both more true and more important” (Frye 132).
In a world where the creation of new life is associated with ever hungry time, virginity is associated with unchanging, perpetual youth, and timelessness. This impossibility of renewing virginity with the cycle of seasons is one reason for the emphasis on preserving virginity: “As winter turns to spring, nature shows a power of regaining her youth that does not exist for individual human life” (Frye 120). In this sense, the concept of virginity renewed with the cycle of the seasons and the resulting freedoms that accompany this change illustrate its power in romance. In a world where virginity is perpetually renewed, every experience is fresh and unique. Similar to how the storyteller seduces the receiver into the story until they lose all concept of time, in a world with renewed virginity time loses its association with destruction and instead becomes an expression of limitless freedom.
HAPPY ENDING
Through these enormous extensions on our lives, we, the receiver of these stories, are the real heroes on a quest for revelation. In the great quest of man, the heroes are not determined ”so much by virtue of what one does, as by virtue of what and how one reads” (Frye 157). By reading these stories and looking past what is obvious, we are getting a glimpse into the real hidden beneath layers of semblances. In romance, man is the straight line but woman the spiral; woman is round, fullness, the cycle of the seasons, the vortex of the romance story itself. In her is contained the power of individuation; to bring together opposites to reclaim identity—and by the same token, reclaim the power of the divine. The human creation and divine creation mirror each other until the blank white wedding sheet stained with the blood of her reclamation of identity reflects the virginal page before ink, the deflowering of the paper with words. By observing the patterns in the machinations of stories, we are observing our own inner clockwork. Through romance, we realize that it is only through lies that we can truly access the real.
This would seem like the logical end to this paper, but we haven’t come full circle yet.
“A mythological universe is a vision of reality in term of human concerns and hopes and anxieties: it is not a primitive form of science. Unfortunately, human nature being what it is, man first acquires a mythological universe and then pretends as long as he can that it is also the actual universe” (Frye 14)
Just as the universe of myth is centered around man, so too was the tangible universe believed to revolve around man, the mortal inhabitant of an indifferent world that is so fond of his stories. Stories offer escape from this reality, if only to create the illusion of understanding and order by reordering the tangible world of a man into art. For those of us who are the recipients of this art, we are left to see past the illusion of understanding to the real beneath.
This is where I’m forced to reflect on my previous views (and identity) to see how I’ve been changed (and I say forced because I’m embarrassed of my narrow views). Before this class, if I heard the word romance awful images come to mind. Most involved the seediest of second hand bookstores overwhelmed by the presence of every Nora Roberts and Nicolas Sparks that has happened upon their shelves. Tattered and creased with use, these little sections of paperbacks were either studiously avoided or openly mocked by customers in mind. I scoffed at them. Formulaic “escape fiction” was hardly the fare of serious readers. However, the concept of literature governed by formulas and the need for escape through art is not an odd concept. As Frye points out, the same building blocks and conventions reoccur throughout a wide tradition of literature beyond these shallow modern conceptions of romance. The art that deals with romance—with the grand adventures, the interplay of light and dark, and even the most misunderstood element (love)—is art irrevocably linked to the elements of reality that man most wants to understand and structure. In other words, not only is every work of art romance, but so too are our lives. In displaying the elements that most demand our attention to escape to, the threads of myth and stories betray the preoccupations and needs that weigh most heavy on the collective mind of mankind. On this great adventure, we all want the same thing: the happy ending.
I know I certainly wanted it as a child. Actually, I believe I demanded it from my stories.
Happy endings must come at the end of something ”…if they happen in the middle of the story, or an adventure, or the like, all they do is cheer things up for a while” (Rushdie 202). So as a writer, I will listen to the naïve child I carry with me, as well as the scholar who is only beginning to learn the machinations of stories and this world. I will try to give the reader a little bitter with the sweet in the best mirrored image of this world. The best of art reflects life, beautifully. Let art have the promise of happy endings, if only we realize that happy is as temporary as the hard times and our tapestry of life and art must hold true to its nature of chiaroscuro. As Soraya says, “There is a limit to how much rain a person can enjoy” (Rushdie 210). We need a balance of both; a time of hardship to feel happiness, a time of silence to enjoy song.
Works Cited
Frye, Northrop. The Secular Scripture: A Study of the Structure of Romance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1976. Print.
Morales, Helen, ed. Greek Fiction: Callirhoe, Daphnis and Chloe, Letters of Chion. London: Penguin Classics, 2011. Print.
Rushdie, Salman. Haroun and the Sea of Stories. New York: Granta in Association with Viking, 1990. Print.
Zimmer, Heinrich Robert, and Joseph Campbell. The King and the Corpse. [New York]: Pantheon, 1948. Print.